<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Squeak People diary for joelkruissink</title>
    <description>Squeak People diary for joelkruissink</description>
    <link>http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/joelkruissink/</link>
    <item>
      <title>14 Feb 2007</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:46:02 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/joelkruissink/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <description>Squeak as as programming language may have the potential to be its own operating environment--operating system.

&lt;p&gt; embedding the language in hardware prince-ops on multiicore chips tightly couples execution of a program in native mode. 

&lt;p&gt; as it now, Squeak is a creature of the host it runs on. the host is procedural the language is object.  the original implementations of smalltalk at parc did not appear to hzve a an operating system host.  was smalltlk actually its own os?

&lt;p&gt; jk    </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
